Market Cap
₪4.96B
Price NIS 49.55
Revenue 2025
₪523.8M
Growth 4.1×
Net Income
₪346.8M
Growth 5.8×
Gross Margin
68.7%
from 56.1% in 2024
Operating Margin
61.6%
from 46.5% in 2024
Order Backlog
₪784.8M
31.12.2025
1 Company Profile
Arit Industries (ARIT) is an Israeli defence-industrial company in accelerated growth, traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The company manufactures defence systems and technology solutions, with a revenue mix of intelligent systems and communications. 2025 was a breakthrough year for Arit — revenue grew 4.1×, net income grew 5.8×, and operating margin rose to 61.6% (from 46.5% in 2024). Market capitalisation: NIS 4.96B. Order backlog: NIS 784.8M. Key observation: a 68.7% gross margin and 61.6% operating margin — exceptional levels that warrant examination of whether they are sustainable or one-off.
| Activity | Feature |
| Defence Systems | Core product |
| Communications Solutions | Advanced systems |
| Smart Systems | Strategic expansion |
| שירותים | תחזוקה ותמיכה |
Source: 2025 Annual Report
2 Key Financial Observations
This summary is not a recommendation. It is a factual list of key financial metrics.
ביצועים 2025
| Metric | Value |
| Revenue | ₪523.8M |
| Net Income | ₪346.8M |
| EPS | ₪3.45 |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% |
| תזרים תפעולי | ₪377.2M |
מדדים נוספים
| Metric | Value |
| Market Cap | ₪4.96B |
| Order Backlog | ₪784.8M |
| P/E | 14.3x |
| Operating Margin | 61.6% |
Missing data: פילוח Customers, חוזים בודדים מהותיים, אחוז הזמנות מצבא ישראל vs ייצוא.
3 Industry & Competitive Context
ביטחון ישראלי. ביקוש גובר עם המלחמה האחרונה. תחרותי מ-Elbit, Rafael, IAI.
| מתחרה | טיקר | הבדל |
| אלביט מערכות | ESLT | ענקית הביטחון הישראלית |
| רפאל | — | ממשלתית |
| IAI | — | ממשלתית |
| נקסטוויז'ן | NXSN | מתחרה ב-stabilized cameras |
4 Risk Factors
| סיכון | הקשר |
| שולי רווח חריגים | 61.6% — חד-פעמי או מבני? |
| תלות בצבא ישראל | אם %גבוה מההזמנות |
| תחרות מ-Elbit | יכולת השקעה ב-R&D שונה |
| סיכון גיאופוליטי | ישראל בסיכון מתמשך |
5 Analytical Lens — The Questions We Ask
In professional company analysis, the question is not "is this good?" but rather "through which lenses must this company be examined so that we do not miss what matters most?" At Bakshi Finance, every analysis passes through six lenses.
This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.
Growth
Revenue up 4.1× — sustainable or one-off?
Profitability
Operating Margin 61.6% — מצב יציב?
Leverage
Balance Sheet יציב — תזרים חיובי
Competitive Position
Against Elbit — a distinctive niche?
Management Quality
Excellent 2025 execution — return to a standard pace?
Business Complexity
Product mix — how should it be valued?
6 Scenario Framework
Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive. They outline possible conditions, not expected outcomes.
These scenarios carry no probability assessment, no preferred direction, and no expectation regarding which, if any, will materialise.
Constructive Scenario — if the following conditions hold:
Large orders from foreign militaries, the backlog continues to grow, margins hold above 50%.
Base Scenario — if current trends continue:
הכנסות גדלות 30-50%, Operating Margin 40-50%, Net Income גדל פי 1.5-2.
Adverse Scenario — if the following risks materialise:
Margins revert to historical levels of 25-30%, backlog erodes, orders decline.
Scenarios describe conditions, not forecasts. There is no preferred direction and no probability assessment expressed in this framework.
7 How to Think About This Company
Arit is a small Israeli defence company that experienced a breakout year. The idea behind analysing Arit is not "is the sector in demand" (yes — in the wake of the war), but rather "is the 61.6% operating margin sustainable, or one-off due to an unusually large contract?" Margins at that level are exceptionally high even for major defence primes.
The critical variables: (a) backlog composition — one large contract or diversified? (b) exports vs Israeli military — the share of each; (c) margin stability over 5-8 quarters.
Where the analysis may go wrong: First error — assuming 61% margins persist forever. Second error — valuing on P/E 14.3× without examining earnings quality. Third error — underestimating the risk of reversion to industry norms (25-35% operating).
Professional analysis addresses three things: (a) contract analysis — one-off versus recurring; (b) geographic diversification; (c) margin comparison with peer companies.
The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible.
The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible.
8 Sources & Data
| # | Source | Date | Type |
| 1 | ארית — דוח Annual 2025 | March 2026 | Official — TASE |
| 2 | maya.tase.co.il | April 2026 | Official — Stock Exchange |
Missing: פילוח Customers, חוזים בודדים מהותיים, אחוז הזמנות מצבא ישראל vs ייצוא.