🟢 Sample analysis — Israeli equity — free full access 60+ additional analyses available to members — Join now
Bakshi Finance

Bezeq — The Israeli Telecommunication Corp.

Bezeq — The Israeli Telecommunication Corp. | TASE | Value Track

BEZQ
Communication Services · Telecom TASE Research Depth · Standard
Market Cap
17.1B₪
Price NIS 6.20
Revenue 2025
8,702M₪
-2% Y/Y
Net Income
1,417M₪
+32% Y/Y
EBITDA
3,704M₪
Margin 42.6%
EPS
0.51₪
+31% Y/Y
Dividend Yield
5.6%
975M₪
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.2x
Rating AA
Fibre Subscribers
993K
+76% Y/Y

1

Company Description

Bezeq is Israel’s largest telecommunications group. It operates the national fixed-line infrastructure (historically a monopoly), an accelerating fibre-optic rollout, mobile services (Pelephone), multi-channel television (yes), and ICT and internet services (Bezeq International). The company trades on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, employs approximately 8,000 staff, and distributes an ongoing dividend. In 2025 the fibre rollout continued at an accelerated pace, reaching 993,000 subscribers.

Fixed-line Fibre Mobile yes ICT
2

Financial Performance

Revenue and Operating Profit
NIS M | 2023–2025
Margins
% | 2023–2025
Metric202320242025
Revenue (NIS M)9,1038,8848,702
Operating Profit (NIS M)1,7791,6522,017
Net Income (M₪)1,1891,0731,417
EBITDA (NIS M)3,6463,4963,704
EBITDA Margin40.1%39.4%42.6%
Net Margin13.1%12.1%16.3%
Operating Margin19.5%18.6%23.2%
EPS (NIS)0.430.390.51
3

Balance Sheet & Cash Flow

Revenue by Segment 2025
NIS M
Free Cash Flow and Dividends
NIS M | 2023–2025
Balance-sheet Metric2025
Total Assets15,938M₪
Shareholders’ Equity2,955M₪
Net Debt8,076M₪
Net Debt / EBITDA2.2x
FCF (2025)1,133M₪
Dividend (2025)975M₪
4

Fibre-Optic Rollout

Fibre Subscribers
Thousands of subscribers | 2023–2025
Operating Profit by Segment 2025
NIS M
Bezeq’s fibre-optic deployment is accelerating: 993,000 fibre subscribers at year-end 2025, a 76% increase year-on-year. Fibre broadband subscribers reached 628,000. The rollout reinforces Bezeq’s competitive moat and generates recurring revenues at elevated operating margins. ARPU ARPU rose to NIS 136.
5

Competitive Position — Sources of the Moat

A legacy telecoms competitive moat is not a single construct — it is layered. Bezeq exhibits five distinct layers, each with its own dynamics:

Network Effect — a large historical customer base with efficient geographic coverage
Switching Costs — changing provider on fixed-line infrastructure requires physical reconnection
Cost Advantage — existing copper infrastructure plus a fibre rollout with integrated cost economics
Intangible Assets — statutory licences, spectrum, and enterprise ICT systems
Efficient Scale — a small national telecoms market (Israel) with a limited number of players

A calibrated assessment of the strength of each layer is available to qualified clients of the Family Office.

7

How to Think About This Company

Bezeq is neither a technology story nor a growth story. It is a contracting regulated monopoly in the Israeli telecoms market, with a legacy copper infrastructure that is gradually being converted into a composite of fibre, mobile and television offerings. The essence of Bezeq — and the reason analysts struggle with it — is that it combines three fundamentally different business models under a single umbrella, inside a regulatory environment whose influence is immense and difficult to price.
The critical variables. First, the trajectory of the fibre rollout — what share of Israeli homes will migrate to Bezeq’s fibre versus competitors such as HOT or Partner, and at what pace. At year-end 2025 the company recorded 993K fibre subscribers (+76% Y/Y) [2025 Annual Report, Maya]. Second, the wholesale-pricing path set by the Ministry of Communications — a policy decision that can materially shift fixed-line segment economics. Third, a net debt / EBITDA ratio of 2.2x and financing costs in a higher-rate environment — these shape Bezeq’s financial flexibility more than they do for most peer telecoms.
Where the analysis may go wrong. First error — treating Bezeq as a "stable dividend equity". This was broadly true through 2018. Since then, volatility in regulation, in the capital structure, and in segment profitability has exceeded the conventional image. Second error — valuing Bezeq by P/E alone. Telecoms with eroding legacy revenues require parallel examination of FCF per share (2025: NIS 1,133M) and of the dividends/CapEx ratio — P/E alone provides only a partial view. Third error — treating yes (the television arm) as a peripheral item; its restructuring at a cost of NIS 543M [2025 Annual Report] affects the consolidated statements far more than its revenue share would suggest.
What distinguishes professional analysis of Bezeq from headlines. Headlines on Bezeq speak of a "generous dividend" or of "regulatory change on the horizon". Professional analysis addresses three things: (a) the legacy conditions that feed into the current state and what preserves or alters them; (b) the plausibility of regulatory scenarios and their segmentation by level of impact; (c) the balance between the business’s cash generation (EBITDA margin 42.6% [2025 Annual Report]) and the CapEx required to preserve competitive relevance. These are not what one buys or sells — they are what one asks before deciding. This site does not participate in the decision.

The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible. The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible.

8

Risks & Items to Monitor

⚠ Risks
Ongoing revenue decline — erosion in legacy services
Restructuring at yes — NIS 543M cost, uncertain outcome
Elevated leverage — D/E 2.95x, sensitivity to interest rates
Regulation — policy shifts in telecoms
Fibre competition — entry of new operators
🚀 Items to Monitor
Fibre rollout — 993K subscribers, +76% Y/Y
ARPU growth — NIS 136, improving product mix
Rising dividend — NIS 975M, 5.6% yield
Margin expansion — EBITDA margin 42.6%
AI + 5G — technology themes to monitor (adoption + future pricing)
9

Scenario Framework

The framework below describes the conditions that would need to hold under each scenario — not a price forecast. These conditions are what a professional analyst monitors over time, and what allows assumptions to be updated as reality changes.

Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive. They outline possible conditions, not expected outcomes. These scenarios carry no probability assessment, no preferred direction, and no expectation regarding which, if any, will materialise.

🟢 Bull Scenario
Fiber Execution + ARPU Expansion + yes Stabilizes
Conditions that would need to hold:
  • Fibre rollout continues at an accelerated pace (>15% annual subscriber growth)
  • ARPU continues to rise via product mix (not price increases)
  • yes stabilises operationally — restructuring concludes without cost overruns
  • Wholesale-segment regulation remains stable or moderate
  • Dividend distribution continues; net debt / EBITDA remains around 2x
🔵 Base Scenario
Slow Decline Offset by Fiber
Conditions that would need to hold:
  • Gradual erosion in legacy fixed-line revenues
  • Fibre partially offsets the erosion
  • yes acts as a visible drag on reported earnings but not on cash flow
  • No material regulatory event in either direction
  • Dividend is maintained at the current level
🔴 Bear Scenario
Structural Pressure Accelerates
Conditions that would need to hold:
  • Accelerated fibre competition — a major new operator enters
  • yes restructuring costs materially overshoot the budget
  • Elevated interest rates persist — financing costs pressure cash flow
  • Unfavourable regulatory change in wholesale pricing
  • Dividend is pressured as FCF contracts
10

Analytical Lens — The Questions We Ask

In professional company analysis, the question is not "is this good?" but rather "through which lenses must this company be examined so that we do not miss what matters most?" Every Bakshi Finance analysis passes through six lenses. The text below is not a judgement — it is a map of the questions this analysis is intended to answer. The specific answers for Bezeq appear in the "How to Think About This Company" section above.

The analysis is based on an internal multi-factor analytical framework used in professional portfolio management. The framework maps the questions; the answers appear woven through the analysis above.

What the lens is not: there is no rating, no score, no comparison between this company and another, and no preference expressed. The same six questions are asked of every company on the site — what varies is the answers, not the instrument.

This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.

📈
Growth
How is the company growing? Is the growth driven by volume, price, or mix? Is it stable across cycles?
💰
Profitability
How do margins behave over time? How much of reported earnings translates into genuine free cash flow?
⚖️
Leverage
What is the capital structure? How flexibly can the company navigate a down-cycle or a period of elevated financing costs?
🏰
Competitive Position
What protects its revenues from erosion? How long is that protection likely to endure?
👔
Management Quality
How does management allocate capital? What is their track record on strategic decisions?
🧩
Business Complexity / Risk
Where would a simplistic analysis go wrong? What is exposed to regulation, cyclicality, or technological change?

Key Observations

1. The business identity. Bezeq is Israel’s largest telecommunications group — fixed-line infrastructure (historical monopoly position), an accelerating fibre-optic rollout, mobile (Pelephone), television (yes), and ICT services. Revenue 2025: NIS 8,702M (~2% Y/Y decline) [2025 Annual Report, Maya].

2. Financial pivot points. Net Income 2025: NIS 1,417M (+32% Y/Y). EBITDA margin: 42.6%. FCF: NIS 1,133M. Dividend: NIS 975M (5.6% yield). Net Debt/EBITDA: 2.2x. 993K fibre subscribers (+76% Y/Y).

3. Three critical crossroads. (a) the fibre-rollout trajectory and the derived revenue cadence; (b) the outcome of the wholesale-pricing review at the Ministry of Communications; (c) the capital structure — financing costs versus dividend flexibility. Each affects the reported statements in a different direction.

4. What this site does not answer. The analysis does not answer the question "hold or not". It provides the lenses through which that decision is made with greater rigour. The decision rests with the client.

This summary is not a recommendation. It is a factual list of what the analysis has identified.

Operating Model & Regulatory Disclosure Bakshi Finance operates as a Family Office serving qualified investors only. Mr. Yaron Bakshi held a licensed investment-advisory practice from 2008 through 2023. As of the date of this publication, the firm does not hold an investment-advisory, investment-marketing or portfolio-management licence. This document is provided for research and professional education purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or take any action with respect to any security. Nothing herein is a substitute for personalised advice based on an individual’s circumstances. All decisions remain the sole responsibility of the investor. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Disclosure: This document does not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. The information is presented for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Investing in securities involves risk, including loss of principal. Investors should conduct independent due diligence and consult a licensed professional before making any investment.
Sources: The analysis is based on official financial filings (2025 Annual Report, 2023–2025 quarterly reports) as published on the Maya system of the Israel Securities Authority. As of 06.04.2026.
© 2026 Bakshi Finance — All rights reserved. No part of this document may be copied, reproduced or distributed without written permission.